This article elaborates on variables associated with the collapse of the North Tower of the World Trade Center. The previously published quantifications of inertia, column capacity, and the assumptions related to the beginning of downward motion, are examined and corrected. The reasons for false conclusions reached in several previous analyses are presented.Yet another peer-reviewed article challenging the "natural" collapse hypothesis for the Twin Towers. A fantastic victory for the 9/11 Truth Movement in the debate over the collapse of the WTC buildings. Congratulations to authors on a job well done!
Comment Policy: Comments are allowed, but please keep them focused on the topic of the post you are commenting on. Comments and/or spam not pertaining to the subject of a particular post will most likely be deleted.
Monday, July 8, 2013
New Peer-Reviewed Paper on the WTC Collapses
Gregory Szuladziński, Tony Szamboti, and Richard Johns have successfully published a paper in the International Journal of Protective Structures, titled Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis. The abstract reads: